Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Amanda Powell
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 17296
    Date: 4/26/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-08296
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Cc:
    Subject:
    Attach:
    Powell, Amanda
    Monday, April 26, 2010 5:01 PM
    secretary
    Barnette, James
    CFTC Comments
    CFTC.DOC.pdf
    Amanda Powell
    Legal Administrative Assistant
    Steptoe & Johnson
    1330 Connecticut Ave, NW
    Washington, DC 20036
    202-429-5503
    [email protected] D. Barnette
    202.429.6207
    jba [email protected]
    1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
    Washington, DC 20036-1795
    Tel 202.429.3000
    Fax 202.429.3902
    steptoe.com
    April 26, 2010
    VIA EMAIL TO SECRETAR Y@CFTC. GO V
    Mr. David Stawick
    Secretary
    Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    1155 21
    st
    Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Re:
    Proposed Speculative Position Limits for
    Referenced Energy Contracts and Associated Regulations
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    Please find below the comments of the National Association of Convenience
    Stores ("NACS") and the Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers of America
    ("SIGMA") regarding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's ("CFTC's" of the
    "Commission's") proposed rulemaking entitled "Proposed Speculative Position Limits
    for Referenced Energy Contracts and Associated Regulations." 75
    Fed. Reg.
    4,144 (Jan.
    26, 2010) (the "Proposed Rule").
    NACS is an international trade association representing more than 2,200 retail and
    1,800 supplier company members. NACS member companies do business in nearly 50
    countries worldwide, with the majority of members based in the United States. The U. S.
    convenience store industry, with approximately 145,000 stores across the United States,
    accounts for over $625 billion in total sales and roughly $450 billion in motor fuels sales
    alone every year.SIGMA represents approximately 270 independent chain retailers and marketers
    of motor fuel. SIGMA members represent significant diversity within the industry.
    While 92 percent are involved in gasoline retailing, 66 percent are involved in
    wholesaling, 36 percent transport product, 25 percent have bulk plant operations, and
    15 percent operate terminals. Member retail outlets come in many forms including travel
    plazas, traditional "gas stations," convenience stores with gas pumps, cardlocks, and
    unattended public fueling locations. Some members sell gasoline over the Internet, many
    are involved in fleet cards, and a few are leaders in the mobile refueling movement.
    Together, NACS and SIGMA members account for approximately 80 percent of
    the country's retail motor fuel sales. Any effort by the CFTC or other governmental
    entities to regulate the fuels marketplace, therefore, will obviously directly or indirectly
    affect fuel marketers and retailers.
    NACS and SIGMA Comments
    It is unlikely that NACS or SIGMA members will be directly regulated by the
    Proposed Rule. The indirect effects of any regulation of the marketplace in energy
    commodities, particularly crude oil and gasoline, are of enormous significance to us. In
    any regulation it puts forward, NACS and SIGMA urge that the Commission carefully
    consider three factors: competition/transparency, the marketplace, and supply.
    Competition/Transparency.
    There is no more competitive, transparent market in
    the United States than in the retail sale of motor fuels. The prices that NACS and
    SIGMA members charge for their fuel products are available to every potential customer
    passing by their places of business, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Studies haveshown that Americans will drive out of their way to save even a penny or two on a gallon
    of gasoline, keeping competition among retailers brisk not only on adjacent street
    corners, but in larger geographical areas as well.
    Competition through transparency is clearly not in play when the markets see
    sudden, irrational, and inexplicable price spikes, as we have seen from time to time over
    the last decade. Crude oil prices at $140/barrel do not make any sense with stable
    supplies and the absence of international threats to those supplies. But NACS and
    SIGMA members, and ultimately their customers, must continue to operate in that
    atmosphere.
    NACS and SIGMA request that, in any final rule governing position limits or
    ancillary aspects of its work in this area, the Commission ensures that the markets in
    crude oil and gasoline remain as transparent as possible. In particular, we advocate that
    all speculative interests in the crude oil and gasoline markets be identified and made
    transparent. This transparency will allow market participants to gauge the forces driving
    the market while not impairing or unduly limiting the liquidity that must exist in the
    markets if they are to fulfill their historic role of permitting commercial entities to hedge
    the risk of holding, or not holding, physical inventory. A more transparent market will
    help such commercial entities make competitive decisions that, ultimately, will benefit
    the American public.
    Motor Fuels Marketplace.
    Congress has fundamentally changed the motor fuels
    marketplace with the adoption of the so-called renewable fuels standards in 2005's
    Energy Policy Act and 2007's Energy Independence and Security Act. Although theimplementation of those standards is not the CFTC's responsibility, the Commission
    should ensure that its work in the energy markets - even just regulation of a limited
    number of companies on position limits - will have an effect on a marketplace that itself
    is undergoing tremendous change, as more and more gasoline is blended with so-called
    "renewable fuels" for public consumption. NACS and SIGMA therefore request that the
    Commission be mindful of the downstream marketplace in its decisionmaking. We
    would be happy to provide the Commission or its staff with more information in this
    important area.
    SunNy. The availability of an abundant supply of motor fuels is literally the
    lifeblood of our industry, and in many respects the American economy. In making its
    decisions concerning any appropriate level of regulation for the futures markets, the
    Commission needs to ensure that it does nothing to diminish the free flow of actual,
    physical products into the market. In other words, we advocate for a system free of
    manipulation and anti-competitive speculation, but only in a manner that does not choke
    off or eliminate the transactions necessary to provide us with product supply.
    NACS and SIGMA appreciate the opportunity to provide the Commission with
    their views regarding the Proposed Rule. Please do not hesitate to contact me if we may
    be of any service to the Commission or its staff.
    Sincerely,
    James D. Barnette