Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Timothy J Bergin
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 16687
    Date: 4/16/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-07687
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    tbergin@pointbayfuel, com
    Friday, April 16, 2010 11:38 AM
    secretary

    I Urge You to Impose
    Speculative Position Limits in
    Energy Futures
    Contracts
    Timothy Bergin
    1288 Hancock Road
    Toms River, NJ 08753-4020
    April 16, 2010
    David Stawick
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear David Stawick:
    I am writing today to strongly endorse comments submitted on April 9, 2010
    by the New England Fuel Institute and the Petroleum Marketers Association
    of America submitted on the proposed rule to implement speculative
    position limits for futures and options contracts for natural gas, crude
    oil, heating oil and gasoline.
    I believe great harm is done to both businesses and consumers due to the
    volatility of these markets which were designed for the opposite purpose,
    to protect businesses and consumers by managing risk based on the sound
    fundamentals of supply and demand. Assertive action must be taken to
    address the extreme price shocks and excessive volatility that led to the
    energy bubble in 2007-2008 created by faux supply and demand that in no
    way reflected the actual fundamentals of the energy market. It is time to
    ensure regulators have the tools they need to restore confidence in the
    market.
    "Speculators" and "Hedgers" needs a commodities market to balance the risk
    inherent in commodities related businesses, however, financial investors
    like banks,hedge funds,and index funds speculate in the energies
    commodities markets for profit, unlike commodities end users who seek to
    protect themselves from volatility and risk. Excessive speculation by
    financial institutions causes market instability. The proposed rulemaking,
    if strengthened and passed, gives the commission the opportunity to take
    an important step in this regard, particularly to limit the positions one
    speculator can control in any single commodity.
    The comments I have written to endorse point out the technical
    imperfections of this rule, and I urge strong consideration of the
    improvements suggested in those comments. The commission has an
    obligation, both by statute, and I believe morally, to establish hard
    limits on the size of positions that speculators can take in the market,
    with no exemptions.10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-07687
    I urge Commissioners to look to the past to determine the future. There is
    strong opposition by the financial community to the proposed rule changes.
    We tried it their ~vay and the cost ~vas significant to businesses like
    mine, consumers like mine, and the economy as a ~vhole; an economy ~vhich
    may not ~vithstand another shock like the one ~ve sa~v ~vith the previous
    energy bubble. Please establish, ~vith quick implementation, restrictive
    speculative position limits for energy commodities.
    Thank you for your time.
    Sincerely,
    Timothy J Bergin