Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: James Robertson
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1646
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COIMMENT
    CL-01646
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    James Robertson
    Thursday, January 21, 2010
    9:08 AM
    secretary

    Regulation of Retail Forex
    To Whom It May Concern,
    I am writing this note in response to the open public comment period in
    relation to the CFTCs plan to again increase leverage requirements with
    regards to forex market trading on RIN 3038-AC61. The recent reduction
    to 100:1, in my opinion was a good one as it pulled non-serious traders
    out of the market. The 100:1 margin requirement is an excellent, sane
    value and does not overly place the trading account in risk by only
    requiring 1% of the account for margin. This allows trades plenty of
    room to breath as the market makes it's normal changes over the life of
    an open position. Increasing the margin requirement to 10:1 is a bad
    idea. The margin requirement of 10% goes against most general trading
    rules of not over leveraging an account. I never place a trade that
    puts me at risk of over 5% of my account, including margin. How can I
    do that if I risk 10% right off the bat? The CFTC is a good regulator,
    but if you continue with the increase of margin requirements, then
    myself and other traders will simply to go retail forex brokers that are
    not regulated by you. This is not good economic policy and is a mistake.
    Please leave the current 100:1 margin requirements in place.
    Concerned Forex Trader
    James Robertson