Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: William Ham
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 16315
    Date: 4/13/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-07315
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    [email protected]
    Tuesday, April
    13, 2010 1:54 PM
    secretary

    Proposed Speculative Position Limits on Energy
    William Ham
    92 Wildwood Road
    Andover, MA 01810-5125
    April 13, 2010
    David Stawick
    Secretary, Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    Three Lafayette Centre
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear Mr. Stawick:
    I am writing in support of the CFTC's Proposed Federal Speculative
    Position Limits that will reestablish speculative position limits on maj or
    energy commodities. This rule will provide stability to the marketplace
    and help prevent future price bubbles. The CFTC must quickly approve a
    strong rule to protect America's struggling economy. Wall Street's
    speculative trading in oil not only hurts the economy, but hurts every
    American who pays excessive prices at the pump, for groceries, home
    heating oil and everything related to transportation.
    While the impact is felt more severely in a recession a recession only
    exacerbates the problem. A recession is only one reason to curb energy
    and other types of speculation that directly affect the public. Supply
    and demand should set the prices in a free market (with minimal necessary
    controls to prevent 'collateral damage' such as excessive pollution).
    When the government allows third parties not directly involved in the
    creation, delivery, and/or consumption of the commodity to interfere with
    this free market seriously bad things happen to most of us.
    The time and money required to implement significant alternative (to
    petroleum and other fossil fuels) energy schemes precludes these
    theoretically competitive forces from operating effectively to control
    speculation in fossil fuels. For the most part there is an inelastic
    market for fossil fuels largely because of this giant barrier to change.
    This provides a seductive environment for power/money driven speculation.
    If one can control even a small part of the pricing in this inelastic
    market exorbitant profits can be made.
    With this kind of temptation it becomes mandatory that regulatory bodies
    like yours step in forcefully and quickly.
    Your committee has the ability, position, and duty to take the advocacy
    position for the country and its citizens above that of opportunistic10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-07315
    third parties who have personal profit or power as motives.
    Our tax dollars were used to bail out large Wall Street firms when they
    were on the brink of bankruptcy. It is these same institutions that
    pushed the price of gasoline well past $4 per gallon in 2008 by gambling
    on oil and continue to profit at every American's expense.
    Paradoxically, this increase in energy prices acts as a tax to both the
    individual and the economy: (1) must be paid to function or continue to
    operate, (2) produces minimal identifiable value to the 'taxpayer', (3)
    cannot be practically avoided, and (4) directly removes money from the
    economy along with the multiplying and stimulative effects it would
    otherwise have.
    Rampant oil speculation by large Wall Street trading firms has resulted in
    extreme volatility in energy markets and unwarranted price spikes in
    recent years. Given that supplies are at record highs and demand remains
    weak, fundamentals cannot explain recent price hikes and destructive price
    swings. Unless the CFTC adopts the proposed rule, markets will continue to
    fluctuate wildly.
    Position limits existed in energy markets until 2001 and currently apply
    to agricultural commodities. CFTC should use its existing experience to
    regulate position limits of speculators and prevent excessive
    concentration in the energy markets, while ensuring that exemptions to
    these limits afforded to real physical players such as fuel cooperatives,
    public utilities, truckers and airlines are not exploited by big banks and
    billionaire investors.
    Energy consumers desperately need true market driven stability in the
    marketplace. The public needs to regain some of its trust in regulatory
    agencies. I encourage the CFTC to adopt the Proposed Federal Speculative
    Position Limits before volatile fuel prices further harm the country's
    already weakened economy and credibility.
    Sincerely,
    William Ham
    9784756850