Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Hawley Forde
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1507
    Date: 1/21/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01507
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Hawley Forde
    Thursday, January 21, 2010 3:04 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    It has come to my attention that there is another round of proposed regulation in the retail forex industry,
    RIN 3038-AC61. Why is this even being considered? Please tell me where this will have a positive
    effective? What is the intent? If you want to reduce risk what business is that of your? If you reduce
    risk you also reduce profit and therefore taxes. In reality how many people does this really affect? Very
    few in the macro scheme of things. So let me ask again, what is the intent and what is the purpose. It
    appears to me that the CFTC has too much time on its hands and is trying to look busy therefore if you
    produce more 'legislation' you look useful. Are other countries following suit in any of your
    regulations? NO!!! because they seem to realize that risk is beneficial for greater profitability. Other
    develpoed countries still maintain their 400:1 leverage while you took ours down to 100:1 and now you
    want to go to 10:1. This is a global market and that means that they would have 40 times the ability to
    profit over us. It seems that you do not understand that it also affects the investment money coming into
    the US. Where ever more money can be made that is where the money flows.
    This is bad regulation. If you need to regulate something then find something that would enhance the
    profitability not hinder it.