Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Luke Poortinga
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1264
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01264
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Luke Poortinga
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 10:03 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Dear Mr. David Stawick,
    I'm writing you as I'm sure many retail Forex investors will regarding the proposed change of
    maximum leverage in Forex from 100:1 to 10:1.
    This is a very simple issue and I will try to explain it that way. It's actually sad for me because based on
    this proposal it's clear that the management at the CFTC have no clue what they are doing. There will
    probably be an attempt to sell this change by making the false claim that too much leverage caused the
    2008 financial collapse which is totally untrue. You should know that this change will mostly hurt
    smaller investors as larger banks and institutions rarely use 100:1 leverage as they have plently of
    capital. It's smaller traders who would suffer should they be forced to trade with 10:1 leverage. But I
    think you will find that trader's will opp to move their money to other Forex brokers not under the
    regulation of the CFTC or brokers not regulated by any agency in the blink of an eye. This would be to
    the great disadvantage to the United States but people won't hesitate to send their money to companies in
    other countries. If getting people to move their savings out of the United States is your intention then
    please go ahead with this change. I already moved my main account to a UK regulated Forex broker last
    summer when the CFTC imposed a mandatory 100:1 maximum leverage cap. I will be encouraging my
    friends and family to do the same should this change become law.
    Sincerely,
    Luke Poortinga
    RIN3038-AC61