Comment Text:
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Three Lafayette Centre
1155 21
st
Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20581
2010 I PR,2 I Pgl -1:133
10-002
COMMENT
CL-02707
Subjeet: Comments on Proposed Speculative Position Limits for Energy (File #10-002)
Dear Mr. Stawick:
I am writing today to endorse comments submitted by the Petroleum Marketers Association of America
and the New England Fuel Institute submitted on April 9, 2010 on the proposed rule to implement
speculative position limits for futures and options contracts for natural gas, crude oil, heating oil and
gasoline. I am also writing to add my own thoughts on this matter to the public record.
Futures markets were designed as a tool for
bonafide
commercial businesses and end-users to manage
risk and "discover" prices for energy based on supply and demand economics. Businesses and
consumers rely on these markets and are harmed when they become excessively volatile or subject to
extreme price shocks, as we saw with the 2007-2008 energy bubble. In the past ten years, such events
have become common and federal regulators failed totake assertive action to address the causes and to
restore confidence in the energy futures markets.
By strengthening and passing this proposed rulemaking, the Commission has an opportunity to take an
important step in this regard. It will be addressing the main cause of recent market instability-
excessive speculation.
Financial investors, including banks, hedge funds and index funds, speculate in
the energy commodities markets for profit, rather than commodity-related businesses and users, who do
so to protect themselves from volatility and risk. Speculators take on the risk that hedgers seek to shed,
however speculation should not dominate the markets. Moreover, one speculator or class of speculator
should not be allowed to take a large, controlling position in any a single commodity.
The Commission has a statutory obligation,, if not a.compelling.~r: ~al ~b!igation, to establish hard limits
on the size of positions that speculators can take in these markets, andto bar them from any exemptions.
The rule that has been proposed is not perfect, m~dagain, I strongly urge the technical improvements
suggested by the comments I have written to endorse.
In considering the rule, Commissioners must lookpast opposition by the financial community and
remember the affect that excessive speculation has on businesses like mine, my consumers and the
broader economy. It should establish restrictive spec-ulative. ~posi:~2~n' limits, and implement them
expeditiously, before we see a repeat of the 2007-2008 energy bubble and another major shock to a
country still recovering from recession.
~10-002
COMMENT
CL-02707
Sincerely,
Eagle Fuels, LLC
1943 S. Water Street
Sapulpa, OK 74066
