Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 4143

  • From: Ken Allen
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 11503
    Date: 4/15/2010

    Comment Text:

    10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02503
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    kallen@midstateenergy, com
    Thursday, April 15, 2010
    8:48 PM
    secretary

    Speculative Position Limits in Energy Futures Contracts
    Ken Allen
    1130 N. Scenic Hwy
    Lake Wales, FL 33853-3249
    April 15, 2010
    David Stawick
    U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
    1155 21st Street, NW
    Washington, DC 20581
    Dear David Stawick:
    I am writing today to endorse comments submitted by the Petroleum
    Marketers Association of America and the New England Fuel Institute
    submitted on April 9, 2010 on the proposed rule to implement speculative
    position limits for futures and options contracts for natural gas, crude
    oil, heating oil and gasoline. Futures markets were designed as a tool
    for bona fide commercial businesses and end-users to manage risk and
    "discover" prices for energy based on supply and demand economics.
    Businesses and consumers rely on these markets and are harmed when they
    become excessively volatile or subject to extreme price shocks, as we saw
    with the 2007-2008 energy bubble. In the past ten years, such events have
    become common and federal regulators failed to take assertive action to
    address the causes and to restore confidence in the energy futures markets.
    By strengthening and passing this proposed rulemaking, the Commission has
    an opportunity to take an important step in this regard. It will be
    addressing the main cause of recent market instability - excessive
    speculation. Financial investors, including banks, hedge funds and index
    funds, speculate in the energy commodities markets for profit, rather than
    commodity-related businesses and users, who do so to protect themselves
    from volatility and risk. Speculators take on the risk that hedgers seek
    to shed, however speculation should not dominate the markets. Moreover,
    one speculator or class of speculator should not be allowed to take a
    large, controlling position in any a single commodity.
    The Commission has a statutory obligation, if not a compelling moral
    obligation, to establish hard limits on the size of positions that
    speculators can take in these markets, and to bar them from any
    exemptions. The rule that has been proposed is not perfect, and again, I
    strongly urge the technical improvements suggested by the comments I have
    written to endorse.
    In considering the rule, Commissioners must look past opposition by the
    financial community and remember the affect that excessive speculation has10-002
    COMMENT
    CL-02503
    on businesses like mine, my consumers and the broader economy. It should
    establish restrictive speculative position limits, and implement them
    expeditiously, before ~ve see a repeat of the 2007-2008 energy bubble and
    another major shock to a country still recovering from recession.
    Thank you for your consideration.
    Sincerely,
    Ken Allen
    863-676-3910