Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Moe Surani
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1117
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01117
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Moe Surani
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 8:32 PM
    secreta ry < secreta ry@ C FTC. g ov >
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    To whom it may concern,
    Re: Regulation of Retail Forex
    I am a retail trader and have worked extremely hard for many many years in this industry
    and have finally managed to keep my head above the water. I am against the 10:1 leverage
    proposal by the CFTC. Reducing the leverage to 100:1 grossly affected my financial situation and
    reducing it to 10:1 will incapacitate me and drive me out of business. My only recourse will be to
    look for an offshore unregulated broker which leaves me uprotected and worse-off. This decision
    will not affect the "big boys" and banks as they have the financial means to trade with a lower
    leverage. The liquidity provided by retail traders increases the efficiency of the markets. Removing
    them, or unfairly pricing them out of the markets will result in increased price volatility overall and
    decrease the efficiency of the markets. Is it not the responsibility of the CFTC to look after interests
    of the retail trader?
    Kindly reconsider this proposal.
    Thank you
    Moe S
    Windows Live Messenger makes it easier to stay in touch -
    learn how!