Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Christopher Stanley
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 1095
    Date: 1/20/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-01095
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    Chris Stanley
    Wednesday, January 20, 2010 6:39 PM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    To whom it may concern,
    I would like to comment on the CFTC proposed regulation of the retail forex markets. As you are well aware certain rules
    need to be adopted for the protection of all entities within these markets, especially the small retail trader. We have all heard
    stories or know someone who have been hurt by the numerous unscrupulous brokers, IB's and counterparties that have
    fleeced retail traders. The internet is littered with firms wanting this business. I have been fortunate to have utilized
    reputable US registered brokers with my accounts over the past three years and the regulations imposed of late have been
    very effective in weeding out the bad firms. As a retail forex trader, I supplement my income trading this market. I am
    strongly opposed to the 10:1 leverage proposal by the CFTC. This regulation/requirement will drive many of the "smaller
    guys" out of the markets entirely or to offshore (ie unregulated) brokers.
    The liquidity provided by retail traders increase the efficiency of the markets. Removing them, or unfairly pricing them out of
    the markets will result in increased price volatility overall and decrease the efficiency of the markets which is bad for
    everyone. In addition to this, US firms will not be able to compete with foreign brokers on the same level, therefore causing
    them to shut down and in turn losing jobs that rightfully belong in the US and not abroad.
    Please reconsider this portion of the proposal. You have already reduced the leverage across the board on exotic pairs and
    the majors pairs are at a maximum of 100:1. In my mind these numbers are ideal for prudent trading. Any worthwhile venture
    requires risk and nothing is guaranteed. People will still trade these great markets but many will do so unprotected if you
    force this requirement. If people are forced to trade outside of the US, the regulators will in effect have neglected their
    responsibilities to the US public.
    Thankyou
    Christopher Stanley
    (631) 846-1757