Font Size: AAA // Print // Bookmark

Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 3281

  • From: Darren Goodman
    Organization(s):

    Comment No: 10
    Date: 1/14/2010

    Comment Text:

    i0-001
    COMMENT
    CL-O0010
    From:
    Sent:
    To:
    Subject:
    DRG
    Thursday, January 14, 2010 11:45 AM
    secretary
    Regulation of Retail Forex
    Regarding proposed rule change of leverage reduction of FX from 100-1 to 10-1.
    I vehemently oppose any change in reduction of leverage in retail FX. I have been trading futures and equities for years and just
    recently, about 2 years ago, made the foray into retail FX trading. That is all I do. For one the ability of the leverage in FX has given
    me the chance to learn this product. I was able to open an account with minimal risk capital until I was able to understand it better and
    trade it within the proper risk guidelines. I feel traders should be able to make the choice for themselves what to do and how to trade
    with their own money. I know there is risk involved but as when the NFA/CFTC lowered the margin down to 100-1 in November of
    2009, I read the letter to Mr. Stanwick. It explained that many brokerages agreed that 100-1 was a good compromise with all the
    exemptions and now increased net capital that will protect me as a customer and trader. I am not a big trader by any means, but I am
    more then satisfied and feel safe with the broker I am with because of these rules that were passed in November of 2009. I also
    thought some of the margins like 400-1 and 700-1 were outrageous as well. I think 100-1 is the perfect combination with the net
    capital requirements as well.
    We are now pretty much inline with all the imm currency futures margin. Also even if the alignment bet~veen retail FX and IMM
    Currency futures is not perfectly aligned, the advantage in IMM is that there are day trading margins available at almost all brokerages
    and that margin is generally 500 USD. So even though stated margin in IMM CURRENCY FUTURES for example the Euro or symbol
    6E might be 4,000 usd, traders can trade that for 500 dollars, So that is a big discrepancy. That's one advantage that retail FX doesn't
    not have, we have low margins but not day trade margins like in the futures. So even with 100-1 leverage as we have now we are
    actually still at a disadvantage to the futures. This reduction in margin down to 10-1 would only exacerbate the disadvantage. This
    would drive business offshore and and give Europe and especially the UK a greater advantage. The US business for trading FX would
    pretty much be left to the big institutions and the retail business would flee overseas where it is more friendly and still regulated in the
    UK. I do not want to see the the US become competitively disadvantaged in Currency trading where London already has a big share
    of the market. Not to mention lots of job losses for all these US retail firms whom would lose business and be forced to lay people off.
    As well as support staff and support business. Please leave the margin of 100-1, where it is currently with no reduction. We as
    customers fee well protected with the rules already in place at NFA/CFTC regulated firms.
    Darren Goodman

AttachmentEdit
CL-00010.pdf