Comment for Proposed Rule 75 FR 67254
Note:
If you experience an issue clicking on the "View Comments", the "Submit Comments", or any other buttons, please clear the cache in your browser and refresh the page. In Chrome or Edge, you may refresh the cache by holding down the ctrl key and clicking the F5 button.
-
-
From:
Sheila Volante
Organization(s):
Private U.S. citizen
Comment No:
26375
Date:
11/8/2010
Comment Text:
Please Do Not Reply This Email.
Public Comments on Alternatives to Use of Credit Ratings: Removal of Reference to or Reliance on Credit Ratings in Commission Regulations:========
Title: Alternatives to Use of Credit Ratings: Removal of Reference to or Reliance on Credit Ratings in Commission Regulations
FR Document Number: 2010-27555
Legacy Document ID:
RIN: null
Publish Date: Tue Nov 02 00:00:00 EDT 2010
Submitter Info:
first_name Sheila
last_name Volante
address1 15200 Eastwood Ave
city Lawndale
country United States
us_state CA
zip 90260
company
The amending the rules 1.49 and 4.24 would not favor the overall reason for the understanding of the credit market. I would side with the commission stating that alternative standards favoring both sided would be favored. The credit market is tumbling by hard ships of financial institution. Making the credit scoring less harsh would allow business to trade and buy more to boost the economy. If the rules were amended then other rules trace to the other guidelines of the credit.
